The Federal Circuit has repeatedly confirmed that secondary consideration evidence is an integral part of an obviousness analysis (indeed, it “may be the most pertinent, probative, and revealing evidence available to the decision maker in reaching a conclusion on the obviousness/nonobviousness Read More>>
Categories Courts, District Courts, Federal Circuit, Guest Contributors, IPWatchdog Articles, Litigation, Patents, USPTO, CAFC, Guest Contributor, intellectual property, inter partes review, IPR, obviousness, patent, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, PTAB, routine limited discovery, secondary consideration evidence
