On February 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a district court’s conclusion of invalidity under Section 112 and/or non-infringement in Synchronoss v. Dropbox. Synchronoss had appealed the district court’s decision that the asserted claims, which were “drawn Read More>>
Categories Courts, District Courts, Federal Circuit, IP News, IPWatchdog Articles, Litigation, Patents, CAFC, indefiniteness, intellectual property, patent, patent eligibility, patent eligible, Patent Litigation, Patentability, patentability requirements, patentable subject matter, Section 112
