fbpx

CAFC Affirms Section 112 Invalidation/ Non-Infringement in Synchronoss v. Dropbox DisputeBy: La’Cee Conleyon February 19, 2021 at 12:15 pm Publication: IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law

On February 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a district court’s conclusion of invalidity under Section 112 and/or non-infringement in Synchronoss v. Dropbox. Synchronoss had appealed the district court’s decision that the asserted claims, which were “drawn  Read More>>

Categories   Courts, District Courts, Federal Circuit, IP News, IPWatchdog Articles, Litigation, Patents, CAFC, indefiniteness, intellectual property, patent, patent eligibility, patent eligible, Patent Litigation, Patentability, patentability requirements, patentable subject matter, Section 112

YouTube
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share