Case Law
2018 Precedential Opinions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS [OPINION]
- WELL LUCK COMPANY, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- KNOWLES ELECTRONICS LLC v. IANCU [OPINION]
- SAUNDERS v. WILKIE [OPINION]
- WWRD US, LLC v. US [OPINION]
- THYSSENKRUPP STEEL v. US [OPINION]
- LLEDO v. OPM [OPINION]
- IN RE: BRANDT [OPINION]
- ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. [OPINION]
- DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT v. APPLE INC. [OPINION]
- DELL INC. v. ACCELERON, LLC [ERRATA]
- GRAY v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [ORDER DENYING EN BANC]
- GRK CANADA, LTD. v. US [OPINION]
- MERIDIAN ENGINEERING COMPANY v. US [OPINION]
- IN RE: POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. [OPINION]
- DELL INC. v. ACCELERON, LLC [OPINION]
- HOLOGIC, INC. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. [OPINION]
- NESTLE USA, INC. v. STEUBEN FOODS, INC. [OPINION]
- STEUBEN FOODS, INC. v. NESTLE USA, INC. [OPINION]
- FEDERAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. DEFENSE [ORDER-Supp Br]
- SIMPLEAIR, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC [OPINION]
- HOLTON v. NAVY [OPINION]
- STEPHENS v. US [OPINION]
- OTTAH v. FIAT CHRYSLER [OPINION]
- CLEVELAND ASSETS, LLC v. US [OPINION]
- BLY v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- KNOWLES ELECTRONICS LLC v. CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. [OPINION]
- NALCO COMPANY v. CHEM-MOD, LLC [OPINION]
- ARENDI S.A.R.L. v. GOOGLE LLC [OPINION]
- AATRIX SOFTWARE, INC v. GREEN SHADES SOFTWARE, INC [OPINION]
- TRAVEL SENTRY, INC. v. DAVID TROPP [ERRATA]
- IN RE: HODGES [OPINION]
- AVIATION & GENERAL INSURANCE v. US [OPINION]
- XITRONIX CORPORATION v. KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION [ORDER]
- O’FARRELL v. DEFENSE [OPINION]
- POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ARCTIC CAT, INC. [OPINION]
- MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC [OPINION]
- BERKHEIMER v. HP INC. [OPINION]
- IN RE: NORDT DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC [OPINION]
- MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS v. INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AMERICAS [OPINION]
- ELBIT SYSTEMS OF AMERICA, LLC v. THALES VISIONIX INC. [OPINION]
- THE MEDICINES COMPANY v. HOSPIRA, INC. [OPINION]
- ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD v. MATAL [OPINION]
- ABBVIE INC. v. MEDIMMUNE LIMITED [OPINION]
- PAICE LLC v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY [OPINION]
- KISOR v. SHULKIN [ORDER DENYING PANEL & EN BANC REHEARING]
- NY AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL v. US [OPINION]
- MAXLINEAR, INC. v. CF CRESPE LLC [OPINION]
- CORE WIRELESS LICENSING v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. [OPINION]
- ARTHREX, INC. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. [OPINION]
- GLYCINE & MORE, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- AGUSTAWESTLAND NORTH AMERICA v. US [OPINION]
- IN RE: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. [OPINION]
- CHANGZHOU TRINA SOLAR ENERGY v. ITC [OPINION]
- FLEXUSPINE, INC. v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC. [OPINION]
- SECURIFORCE INTERNATIONAL v. US [OPINION]
- EXMARK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BRIGGS & STRATTON POWER [OPINION]
- ADVANCED VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES v. HTC CORPORATION [OPINION]
- FINJAN, INC. v. BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC. [OPINION]
- WI-FI ONE, LLC v. BROADCOM CORPORATION [EN BANC OPINION]
- UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE v. OOC [OPINION]
- MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS [OPINION]
- PLEASURE-WAY INDUSTRIES, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- CAPELLA SALES & SERVICES LTD. v. US [OPINION]
- ALPINE PCS, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- BRYANT v. MSPB [OPINION]
- MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. BISCOTTI, INC. [OPINION]
- HENDERSON v. DVA [CORRECTED OPINION]
- REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS v. MERUS N.V. [ORDER]
- BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE v. MATAL [OPINION]
- CHEMTALL, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- TRAVEL SENTRY, INC. v. DAVID TROPP [OPINION]
- CREDIFORD v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- HTC CORPORATION v. CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP. [OPINION]
- IN RE: ERIK BRUNETTI [OPINION]
- AMGEN INC. v. SANDOZ [OPINION]
- EBANKS v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- LENTZ v. MSPB [OPINION]
- NOBELBIZ, INC. v. GLOBAL CONNECT, L.L.C. [ORDER DENYING EN BANC]
- INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC v. BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. [OPINION]
- ARCTIC CAT INC. v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL [OPINION]
- CRFD RESEARCH, INC. v. MATAL [OPINION]
- MORRISON v. NAVY [OPINION]
- PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC. v. AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS [OPINION]
- BASF CORPORATION v. JOHNSON MATTHEY INC. [OPINION]
- GRAY v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OPINION]
- IN RE: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. [MOTION PANEL ORDER]
- PROMEGA CORP v. LIFE TECH [OPINION]
- SANOFI v. WATSON LABORATORIES INC. [OPINION]
- SIMMONS v. HHS [OPINION]
- FREEMAN v. US [OPINION]
- INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. US [OPINION]
- TWO-WAY MEDIA LTD. v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS [OPINION]
- BAYER PHARMA AG v. WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. [OPINION]
- MASTERMINE SOFTWARE, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION [OPINION]
- PARKINSON v. DOJ [EN BANC OPINION]
- MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. HOSPIRA, INC. [OPINION]
- SMART SYSTEMS INNOVATIONS, LLC v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY [ERRATA]
- ARISTA NET 2 WORKS, INC. v. ITC [OPINION]
- SMART SYSTEMS INNOVATIONS, LLC v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY [OPINION]
- SECURED MAIL SOLUTIONS LLC v. UNIVERSAL WILDE, INC. [OPINION]
- FEDERAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. DEFENSE [ORDER GRANTING EN BANC]
- ORGANIK KIMYA AS v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY [OPINION]
- OWENS CORNING v. FAST FELT CORPORATION [OPINION]
- AMGEN INC. v. SANOFI [OPINION]
- AQUA PRODUCTS, INC. v. MATAL [EN BANC OPINION]
- JANG v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION [OPINION]
- IN RE: SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC. [OPINION]
- IN RE: CRAY INC.
- NFC TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. MATAL [OPINION]
- GOODMAN v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- FIRST DATA CORPORATION v. INSELBERG [OPINION]
- IDEMITSU KOSAN CO., LTD. v. SFC CO. LTD. [OPINION]
- WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [OPINION]
- WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [OPINION]
- ALLIED MINERAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. OSMI, INC. [OPINION]
- INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC [OPINION]
- LUMMI TRIBE v. US [OPINION]
- SOUTHWIRE COMPANY v. CERRO WIRE LLC [OPINION]
- INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS v. KELLOGG NORTH AMERICA COMPANY [ERRATA]
- PICCOLO v. MSPB [OPINION]
- KISOR v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS v. KELLOGG NORTH AMERICA COMPANY [OPINION]
- LIFETIME INDUSTRIES, INC. v. TRIM-LOK, INC. [OPINION]
- YANKO v. US [OPINION]
- MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION v. EVE-USA, INC. [PETITION ORDER]
- NANTKWEST, INC. v. MATAL [ORDER GRANTING EN BANC]
- VICOR CORPORATION v. SYNQOR, INC. [OPINION]
- HARRIS v. US [OPINION]
- RETURN MAIL, INC. v. USPS [OPINION]
- ULTRATEC, INC. v. CAPTIONCALL, LLC [OPINION]
- IN RE: STEPAN COMPANY [OPINION]
- ALVARADO HOSPITAL, LLC v. COCHRAN [OPINION]
- NIDEC MOTOR CORPORATION v. ZHONGSHAN BROAD OCEAN MOTOR CO [OPINION]
- GAZELLE v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- ALVARADO HOSPITAL, LLC v. COCHRAN [ERRATA]
- GAZELLE v. SHULKIN [ERRATA]
- IPCOM GMBH & CO. v. HTC CORPORATION [ERRATA]
- GEORGETOWN RAIL 2 EQUIPMENT v. HOLLAND L.P. [OPINION]
- VISUAL MEMORY LLC v. NVIDIA CORPORATION [OPINION]
- RUMSEY v. DOJ [OPINION]
- AIA AMERICA, INC. v. AVID RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS [OPINION]
- AIRPORT ROAD ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. US [OPINION]
- IN RE: NORTH CAROLINA LOTTERY [OPINION]
- AMGEN INC. v. HOSPIRA, INC. [OPINION]
- ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC. [OPINION]
- IN RE: I.AM.SYMBOLIC, LLC [OPINION]
- PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC v. ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION [OPINION]
- DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURER v. US [OPINION]
- HOMELAND HOUSEWARES, LLC v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION [OPINION]
- LEE’S FORD DOCK, INC. v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY [OPINION]
- HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. v. MEXICHEM AMANCO HOLDING S.A. [OPINION]
- HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [ERRATA]
- REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS v. MERUS N.V. [OPINION]
- EARNHARDT v. KERRY EARNHARDT, INC. [OPINION]
- SOFT GEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. JARROW FORMULAS, INC. [OPINION]
- FEDORA v. MSPB [ORDER DENYING PETITION]
- MUSSELMAN v. ARMY [ORDER]
- VOCKE v. MSPB [ORDER denying petition]
- MISKILL v. SSA [OPINION]
- MANZANARES v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- THE CONTAINER STORE v. US [OPINION]
- PETRO-HUNT, L.L.C. v. US [OPINION]
- MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS v. SANDOZ INC. [OPINION]
- JOHNSON v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- APEX FROZEN FOODS PRIVATE LTD. v. US [OPINION]
- APEX FROZEN FOODS PRIVATE LTD. v. US [OPINION]
- GENBAND US LLC v. METASWITCH NETWORKS CORP. [OPINION]
- IPCOM GMBH & CO. v. HTC CORPORATION [OPINION]
- ADJUSTACAM, LLC v. NEWEGG, INC. [OPINION]
- MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION v. US [OPINION]
- ADAMS v. US [OPINION]
- STANFORD UNIVERSITY v. THE CHINESE UNIV. OF HONG KONG [OPINION]
- NANTKWEST, INC. v. MATAL [OPINION]
- STORER v. CLARK [OPINION]
- NEXLEARN, LLC v. ALLEN INTERACTIONS, INC. [OPINION]
- OUTDRY TECHNOLOGIES v. GEOX S.P.A. [OPINION]
- THE CLEVELAND CLINIC v. TRUE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS LLC [OPINION]
- EMERACHEM HOLDINGS, LLC v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA [ERRATA]
- EMERACHEM HOLDINGS, LLC v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA [OPINION]
- DAV v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OPINION]
- ONE-E-WAY, INC. v. ITC [OPINION]
- CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP. v. WESTLAKE SERVICES [OPINION]
- LYONS v. THE AMERICAN COLLEGE [OPINION]
- NEW WORLD INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC [OPINION]
- SNYDER v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OPINION]
- WYANDOT NATION OF KANSAS v. US [OPINION]
- TARTAGLIA v. DVA [OPINION]
- SKKY, INC. v. MINDGEEK, S.A.R.L. [OPINION]
- SECURE AXCESS, LLC v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION [ORDER DENYING PET RHG]
- ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES v. GUARDIAN PROTECTION SERVICES [OPINION]
- EVANS v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION [OPINION]
- CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. v. ALL-TAG SECURITY S.A. [OPINION]
- SUNTEC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. v. US [ERRATA]
- PRESTON v. NAGEL [OPINION]
- KITLINSKI v. MSPB [OPINION]
- SUNTEC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. v. US [OPINION]
- MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION v. US [OPINION]
- HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC. [OPINION]
- OLLIS v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC. [OPINION]
- LEE v. MSPB [OPINION]
- JOSEPH PHELPS VINEYARDS, LLC v. FAIRMONT HOLDINGS, LLC [OPINION]
- RIVERA v. ITC [OPINION]
- MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL LLC v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. [OPINION]
- ARCELORMITTAL v. AK STEEL CORPORATION [OPINION]
- ROVALMA, S.A. v. BOHLER-EDELSTAHL GMBH & CO. KG [OPINION]
- AYLUS NETWORKS, INC. v. APPLE INC. [OPINION]
- NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY [OPINION]
- CASCADES PROJECTION LLC v. EPSON AMERICA, INC. [ORDER]
- IN RE: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II [OPINION]
- CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. CIRREX SYSTEMS, LLC [OPINION]
- GARCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY [OPINION]
- STARR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY v. US [OPINION]
- HELMAN v. DVA [OPINION]
- ADKINS v. US [OPINION]
- BOOMERANG TUBE LLC v. US [OPINION]
- IN RE: AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC [OPINION]
- IN RE: AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC [OPINION]
- DELLEW CORPORATION v. US [OPINION]
- HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [OPINION]
- NORTHWEST TITLE AGENCY, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- NICHIA CORPORATION v. EVERLIGHT AMERICAS, INC. [OPINION]
- REOFORCE, INC. v. US [ERRATA]
- RECOGNICORP, LLC v. NINTENDO CO., LTD. [OPINION]
- CALL HENRY, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- 8X8, INC. v. US [OPINION]
- MONK v. SHULKIN [OPINION]
- SNYDER v. NAVY [OPINION]
- FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORP. v. POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. [MOTION PANEL ORDER]
- BANKS v. MSPB [OPINION]
- REMBRANDT WIRELESS v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS [OPINION]
- PHIL-INSUL CORP. v. AIRLITE PLASTICS CO. [OPINION]
2017 Term Opinions of the United States Supreme Court:
- Kisela v. Hughesv nature
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
- Hall v. Hall
- Ayestas v. Davis
- Marinello v. United States
- Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
- Texas v. New Mexico
- U. S. Bank N. A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC
- Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.
- Jennings v. Rodriguez
- Patchak v Zinke
- Murphy v. Smith
- Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran
- Class v. United States
- Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers
- Montana v Wyoming
- CNH Industrial N. V. v. Reese
- National Assn. of Mfrs. v. Department of Defense
- Artis v. District of Columbia
- District of Columbia v. Wesby
- Tharpe v. Sellers
- In Re United States
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of Chicago
- Dunn v. Madison
- Kernan v. Cuero
Links
- Canadian Intellectual Property Office
- Chinese Patent Office
- European Patent Office
- French National Institute of Industrial Property
- German Patent and Trade Mark Office
- Italian Patent and Trademark Office
- Japanese Patent Office
- Spanish Patent and Trademark Office
- Taiwan Patent and Trademark Office
- United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- World Intellectual Property Organization
